Roman Collector Posted June 17 · Patron Share Posted June 17 Interesting find. "Archaeologists have uncovered a hoard of silver and bronze coins dating from the 4th century CE buried in the foundations of an ancient, destroyed Jewish public building in the central Israel city of Lod, the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) announced on Sunday. The 94 coins were probably buried for safekeeping during the events of the Gallus Revolt (351-354 CE), a lesser-known Jewish uprising against Roman rule in the land of Israel, but the building was destroyed and the coins were never recovered, the IAA said. The Gallus Revolt was named by historians after the Roman Emperor Constantius Gallus (326–354), who at the time was presiding over a fractured, weakened empire, but specifics about the events 'are not clear,' explained IAA archaeologist Mor Viezel, co-director of the Lod excavations, to The Times of Israel." 13 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steppenfool Posted June 17 · Member Share Posted June 17 Very interesting. Fascinating that there are still 3rd century Antiochian Tetradrachms in this hoard, but no sign of Imperial Silver. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seth77 Posted June 17 · Member Share Posted June 17 (edited) I was just reading this earlier and noticed the reporter did not have an actual grasp of the era -- he seems to not differentiate between Gallus and Constantius II, at a certain point there is the inference that Gallus went to fight off Magnentius, which is what prompted the Jewish revolt. Edited June 17 by seth77 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerosmyfavorite68 Posted June 19 · Member Share Posted June 19 I somehow missed this topic. That's very interesting how third century Tetradrachmae are showing up in this hoard. Is this an isolated incident? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benefactor Ancient Coin Hunter Posted Friday at 11:48 AM · Benefactor Benefactor Share Posted Friday at 11:48 AM I am assuming tetradrachms circulated more widely in Judaea than denarii, both Syrian and Tyrian shekels. It is interesting to see that the archaeologists found them in the same context as fourth century bronze pieces. One can only imagine the tariff between silver and bronze at the time. It would take a whole lot of fallen horseman coins to equal a tetradrachm, probably. Thanks for bringing the story to our attention. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GinoLR Posted Friday at 01:11 PM · Member Share Posted Friday at 01:11 PM The tetradrachms seem to be Trajan Decius, Etruscilla and Trebonianus Gallus, that is to say minted between 249 and 253. At this time there were no Tyrian shekels, not even denarii, just antoniniani. What is interesting is the absence of antoniniani in this pile of coins. All the coins visible on the picture seem to be Trajan Decius and Trebonianus Gallus, then a gap of 60 years, then Constantinian LRB and fallen horsemen coins of different modules. The mid-3rd c. tetradrachms were probably at the time worth 2 antoniniani. But they surely did not circulate in the mid-4th century ! Is it an intrusion? 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerosmyfavorite68 Posted Saturday at 10:45 PM · Member Share Posted Saturday at 10:45 PM If these were a true find, perhaps somehow they happened upon two different containers, secreted at different times? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.