hotwheelsearl Posted Monday at 05:45 PM · Member Share Posted Monday at 05:45 PM So this guy traded one roach for another. However isn’t the first one pretty rare and valuable? VIRT EXERC camp plans tend to be hard to find. they both are poor grade though. I probably would have kept the first myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kali Posted Monday at 06:07 PM · Member Share Posted Monday at 06:07 PM So basically the collector traded a roach with 1 antenna versus one roach with the common 2 antenna. 1 antenna roaches are rare, but it's still a roach.😎 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAZ Numismatics Posted Monday at 06:14 PM · Member Share Posted Monday at 06:14 PM My question is: at what stage of decay does a coin become uncollectable? 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotwheelsearl Posted Monday at 06:23 PM · Member Author Share Posted Monday at 06:23 PM 8 minutes ago, JAZ Numismatics said: My question is: at what stage of decay does a coin become uncollectable? Pretty much when it becomes a slick, probably. Cleopatra VII coins are almost always in very worn or poor condition and always sell for a ton 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akeady Posted Monday at 07:14 PM · Supporter Share Posted Monday at 07:14 PM They're worse than the Colosseum coin of a few days ago 😄 Even I wouldn't keep either of them. ATB, Aidan. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerosmyfavorite68 Posted Monday at 08:33 PM · Member Share Posted Monday at 08:33 PM Me, neither, and I used to be the king of decrepit coins. Both are infinitely worse than the $1.50 1990's as bulk lots I picked up. They're comparable to some of the modern $3 lots, though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amarmur Posted Monday at 10:05 PM · Member Share Posted Monday at 10:05 PM In that condition, both are probably not worth owning in my opinion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salomons Cat Posted Monday at 10:28 PM · Member Share Posted Monday at 10:28 PM I have to admit, my initial thought was aligned with @JAZ Numismatics’. But in the end, what really matters is that everyone is happy. If these coins bring joy, why should we say they’re not worth collecting? 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amarmur Posted Monday at 10:54 PM · Member Share Posted Monday at 10:54 PM 12 minutes ago, Salomons Cat said: I have to admit, my initial thought was aligned with @JAZ Numismatics’. But in the end, what really matters is that everyone is happy. If these coins bring joy, why should we say they’re not worth collecting? I guess I'm viewing it from a perspective of my kids selling it in the future. Even if something is rare if it's in horrible condition selling it will be difficult. I have a Trajan column denarius in bad shape, and no one wants to buy it. It's fine if it brings anyone enjoyment but from my personal perspective, I feel bad when I spend a lot on an ugly coin even if it is rare (depends on what we are talking about). It's occasionally cool to spend a few dollars on a cool cull but only if it kind of serves its place in your collection, but I don't like seeing a cull coin next to a xf example, so I keep very few low-grade examples or keep them in a different part of my binder of ancients. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salomons Cat Posted Monday at 11:18 PM · Member Share Posted Monday at 11:18 PM 20 minutes ago, Amarmur said: I guess I'm viewing it from a perspective of my kids selling it in the future. Exactly from this perspective it might make sense to collect coins that cost barely anything, except shipping fees. Nobody knows if our heirs will be able to recover what we have invested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPK Posted Monday at 11:36 PM · Supporter Share Posted Monday at 11:36 PM I wouldn't want either coin, but if I had to pick between the two I'd keep the Constantinian coin. It at least has some rarity to offer as an excuse for its poor condition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotwheelsearl Posted 23 hours ago · Member Author Share Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, Salomons Cat said: Exactly from this perspective it might make sense to collect coins that cost barely anything, except shipping fees. Nobody knows if our heirs will be able to recover what we have invested. Almost certainly not lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayAg47 Posted 22 hours ago · Member Share Posted 22 hours ago (edited) Damages don't deter me from buying coins, except the coin needs to be either extremely interesting or historically significant. At least the below coin has a certain eye-appeal with all the main elements present, but I would've passed up on it if it were to be totally worn slick or had bronze disease like the coins above. Valerian I, Seleucia ad Calycadnum Obv. laureate, draped and cuirassed bust of Valerian, ΑVΚ ΠΟ ΛΙΚ ΟΥΑΛƐΡΙΑΝΟϹ Rev. Athena Promachos l. spearing at anguiped Enceladus who raises hands in resistance- ϹƐΛΕΥΚƐΩΝ ΤΩΝ Π[ ]ΚΛΥ(?) 253-260 AD 6.3 g SNG 1059. Edited 21 hours ago by JayAg47 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.